Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Malta
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Trinidad and Tobago
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta rank
150th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
153rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Malta
  • Trinidad and Tobago
000000196119922024

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 150th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 153rd of 166 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Malta
1980s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Malta
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Malta
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Malta
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Malta or Trinidad and Tobago?
Malta, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Malta and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Trinidad and Tobago?
48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2017.
How do Malta and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Malta ranks 150th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 153rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/trinidad-and-tobago/">Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,888 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.