How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Namibia?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Madagascar vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Madagascar

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Namibia

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Madagascar rank

52nd

Namibia rank

50th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

Madagascar
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Madagascar, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 52nd and Namibia ranks 50th of 166 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Madagascar	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Madagascar
1990s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Madagascar
2000s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Madagascar
2010s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Madagascar
2020s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Madagascar or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Madagascar as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Madagascar and Namibia?: 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Namibia?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Madagascar and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?: Madagascar ranks 52nd and Namibia ranks 50th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/madagascar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/madagascar/namibia/">Madagascar vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit: t per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 8,888 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.