Luxembourg vs Sweden: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Luxembourg
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Sweden
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Luxembourg rank
143rd
Sweden rank
141st
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Luxembourg
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 143rd and Sweden ranks 141st of 166 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Luxembourg or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Luxembourg and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Luxembourg ranks 143rd and Sweden ranks 141st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.