Hungary vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Hungary
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Papua New Guinea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Hungary rank
142nd
Papua New Guinea rank
144th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Hungary
  • Papua New Guinea
0000196119922024

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 142nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 144th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Hungary
1970s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Hungary
1980s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Hungary
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Hungary
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Hungary or Papua New Guinea?
Hungary, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Hungary and Papua New Guinea?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Papua New Guinea?
50 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2017.
How do Hungary and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Hungary ranks 142nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 144th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/hungary/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/hungary/papua-new-guinea/">Hungary vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,888 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.