Spain vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Spain
0.1834 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Uganda
0.1894 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain rank
36th
Uganda rank
34th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Spain
  • Uganda
0.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.1894 t per square kilometre against 0.1834 t per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 0.006 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 34th of 167 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.057 t per square kilometre 0.0518 t per square kilometre 0.0053 t per square kilometre Spain
1970s 0.0778 t per square kilometre 0.0687 t per square kilometre 0.0091 t per square kilometre Spain
1980s 0.0803 t per square kilometre 0.0657 t per square kilometre 0.0146 t per square kilometre Spain
1990s 0.151 t per square kilometre 0.0742 t per square kilometre 0.0769 t per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.19 t per square kilometre 0.1182 t per square kilometre 0.0719 t per square kilometre Spain
2010s 0.1735 t per square kilometre 0.1676 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Spain or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.1894 t per square kilometre against 0.1834 t per square kilometre in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Spain and Uganda?
0.006 t per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Uganda?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Spain and Uganda rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Spain ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/spain/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/spain/uganda/">Spain vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.