South Sudan vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

South Sudan
0.0343 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan
0.032 t per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
109th
Sudan rank
111th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • South Sudan
  • Sudan
00.010.020.030.04201220172023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0.0343 t per square kilometre against 0.032 t per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0.0023 t per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Sudan ahead.

South Sudan ranks 109th and Sudan ranks 111th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.034 t per square kilometre 0.0342 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Sudan
2020s 0.0341 t per square kilometre 0.0329 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, South Sudan or Sudan?
South Sudan, at 0.0343 t per square kilometre against 0.032 t per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between South Sudan and Sudan?
0.0023 t per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sudan?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Sudan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
South Sudan ranks 109th and Sudan ranks 111th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/sudan/">South Sudan vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.