South Sudan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

South Sudan
0.0343 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0347 t per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
109th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
108th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • South Sudan
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0347 t per square kilometre against 0.0343 t per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0004 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

South Sudan ranks 109th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 108th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2010s 0.034 t per square kilometre 0.0373 t per square kilometre 0.0033 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0341 t per square kilometre 0.0324 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, South Sudan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0347 t per square kilometre against 0.0343 t per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0004 t per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
South Sudan ranks 109th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 108th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/st-kitts-and-nevis/">South Sudan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.