Slovenia vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Slovenia
0.3259 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Palestine
0.3509 t per square kilometre
in 2022
Slovenia rank
16th
Palestine rank
13th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Slovenia
  • Palestine
0.10.20.30.40.5199220072022

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.3509 t per square kilometre against 0.3259 t per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.025 t per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Slovenia ahead.

Slovenia ranks 16th and Palestine ranks 13th of 167 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3626 t per square kilometre 0.2941 t per square kilometre 0.0685 t per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 0.3469 t per square kilometre 0.1842 t per square kilometre 0.1627 t per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 0.3108 t per square kilometre 0.215 t per square kilometre 0.0957 t per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Slovenia or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.3509 t per square kilometre against 0.3259 t per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2022.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Slovenia and Palestine?
0.025 t per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Palestine?
24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2017.
How do Slovenia and Palestine rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Slovenia ranks 16th and Palestine ranks 13th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Slovenia vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.