Rwanda vs Slovenia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Rwanda
0.318 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
0.3259 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Rwanda rank
19th
Slovenia rank
16th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Rwanda
  • Slovenia
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.3259 t per square kilometre against 0.318 t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0079 t per square kilometre.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 19th and Slovenia ranks 16th of 167 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1055 t per square kilometre 0.374 t per square kilometre 0.2685 t per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 0.2099 t per square kilometre 0.3469 t per square kilometre 0.137 t per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 0.2485 t per square kilometre 0.3108 t per square kilometre 0.0623 t per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Rwanda or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.3259 t per square kilometre against 0.318 t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Rwanda and Slovenia?
0.0079 t per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Slovenia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Rwanda and Slovenia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Rwanda ranks 19th and Slovenia ranks 16th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Slovenia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/slovenia/">Rwanda vs Slovenia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.