Panama vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Panama
0.1378 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.128 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Panama rank
46th
Romania rank
49th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Panama
- Romania
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.1378 t per square kilometre against 0.128 t per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0098 t per square kilometre.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Panama ranks 46th and Romania ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0465 t per square kilometre | 0.2122 t per square kilometre | 0.1657 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 1970s | 0.07 t per square kilometre | 0.2931 t per square kilometre | 0.2231 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 1980s | 0.0917 t per square kilometre | 0.2641 t per square kilometre | 0.1724 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 1990s | 0.1202 t per square kilometre | 0.2613 t per square kilometre | 0.1411 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.1242 t per square kilometre | 0.1879 t per square kilometre | 0.0638 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.1509 t per square kilometre | 0.1385 t per square kilometre | 0.0124 t per square kilometre | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Panama or Romania?
- Panama, at 0.1378 t per square kilometre against 0.128 t per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Panama and Romania?
- 0.0098 t per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Romania?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
- How do Panama and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Panama ranks 46th and Romania ranks 49th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.