New Zealand vs Switzerland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

New Zealand
0.6218 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland
0.5731 t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
4th
Switzerland rank
6th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • New Zealand
  • Switzerland
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.6218 t per square kilometre against 0.5731 t per square kilometre in Switzerland, a difference of 0.0487 t per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.

New Zealand ranks 4th and Switzerland ranks 6th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2473 t per square kilometre 0.4984 t per square kilometre 0.2511 t per square kilometre Switzerland
1970s 0.4016 t per square kilometre 0.6476 t per square kilometre 0.246 t per square kilometre Switzerland
1980s 0.4254 t per square kilometre 0.6967 t per square kilometre 0.2713 t per square kilometre Switzerland
1990s 0.4803 t per square kilometre 0.6201 t per square kilometre 0.1398 t per square kilometre Switzerland
2000s 0.5263 t per square kilometre 0.5407 t per square kilometre 0.0144 t per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 0.5424 t per square kilometre 0.5737 t per square kilometre 0.0313 t per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 0.6153 t per square kilometre 0.5723 t per square kilometre 0.043 t per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, New Zealand or Switzerland?
New Zealand, at 0.6218 t per square kilometre against 0.5731 t per square kilometre in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between New Zealand and Switzerland?
0.0487 t per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Switzerland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Switzerland rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
New Zealand ranks 4th and Switzerland ranks 6th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Switzerland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/switzerland/">New Zealand vs Switzerland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.