Montenegro vs Samoa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Montenegro
0.0838 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
0.0798 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro rank
68th
Samoa rank
71st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Montenegro
  • Samoa
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0.0838 t per square kilometre against 0.0798 t per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0.004 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Samoa ahead.

Montenegro ranks 68th and Samoa ranks 71st of 167 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0546 t per square kilometre 0.0687 t per square kilometre 0.0141 t per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 0.051 t per square kilometre 0.0861 t per square kilometre 0.0351 t per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 0.078 t per square kilometre 0.0794 t per square kilometre 0.0014 t per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Montenegro or Samoa?
Montenegro, at 0.0838 t per square kilometre against 0.0798 t per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Montenegro and Samoa?
0.004 t per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Samoa?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Montenegro and Samoa rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Montenegro ranks 68th and Samoa ranks 71st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Samoa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/samoa/">Montenegro vs Samoa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.