Mauritius vs Samoa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Mauritius
0.0803 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
0.0798 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
70th
Samoa rank
71st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Samoa
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0803 t per square kilometre against 0.0798 t per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0.0005 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 70th and Samoa ranks 71st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 5 and Samoa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0814 t per square kilometre 0.0316 t per square kilometre 0.0498 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0986 t per square kilometre 0.0299 t per square kilometre 0.0687 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0542 t per square kilometre 0.0403 t per square kilometre 0.0139 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.1004 t per square kilometre 0.0568 t per square kilometre 0.0436 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.1049 t per square kilometre 0.0673 t per square kilometre 0.0376 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0845 t per square kilometre 0.0861 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 0.0761 t per square kilometre 0.0794 t per square kilometre 0.0033 t per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Mauritius or Samoa?
Mauritius, at 0.0803 t per square kilometre against 0.0798 t per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Mauritius and Samoa?
0.0005 t per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Samoa rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Mauritius ranks 70th and Samoa ranks 71st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Samoa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/samoa/">Mauritius vs Samoa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.