Mauritius vs Montenegro: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Mauritius
0.0803 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
0.0838 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
70th
Montenegro rank
68th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Montenegro
0.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0.0838 t per square kilometre against 0.0803 t per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0035 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 70th and Montenegro ranks 68th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0907 t per square kilometre 0.0546 t per square kilometre 0.0362 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0845 t per square kilometre 0.051 t per square kilometre 0.0336 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0761 t per square kilometre 0.078 t per square kilometre 0.0019 t per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Mauritius or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 0.0838 t per square kilometre against 0.0803 t per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Mauritius and Montenegro?
0.0035 t per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Montenegro rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Mauritius ranks 70th and Montenegro ranks 68th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Montenegro: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/montenegro/">Mauritius vs Montenegro: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.