Mauritania vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Mauritania
0.0059 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0056 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
152nd
Namibia rank
153rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
0.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.0059 t per square kilometre against 0.0056 t per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0003 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 153rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0023 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0.0043 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0025 t per square kilometre 0.006 t per square kilometre 0.0035 t per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0046 t per square kilometre 0.0062 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0055 t per square kilometre 0.0047 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.0058 t per square kilometre 0.004 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Mauritania or Namibia?
Mauritania, at 0.0059 t per square kilometre against 0.0056 t per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Mauritania and Namibia?
0.0003 t per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Mauritania ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 153rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.