Kazakhstan vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Kazakhstan
0.0229 t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0235 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
123rd
New Caledonia rank
121st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • New Caledonia
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0235 t per square kilometre against 0.0229 t per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 123rd and New Caledonia ranks 121st of 167 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0286 t per square kilometre 0.0291 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.0196 t per square kilometre 0.0265 t per square kilometre 0.0068 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.017 t per square kilometre 0.024 t per square kilometre 0.007 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0224 t per square kilometre 0.0227 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Kazakhstan or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.0235 t per square kilometre against 0.0229 t per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Kazakhstan and New Caledonia?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Caledonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and New Caledonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Kazakhstan ranks 123rd and New Caledonia ranks 121st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/new-caledonia/">Kazakhstan vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.