Italy vs Poland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Italy
0.2593 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Poland
0.2717 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Italy rank
25th
Poland rank
24th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Italy
  • Poland
0.10.20.30.4196119892017

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.2717 t per square kilometre against 0.2593 t per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 0.0124 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.

Italy ranks 25th and Poland ranks 24th of 167 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2748 t per square kilometre 0.2553 t per square kilometre 0.0195 t per square kilometre Italy
1970s 0.3655 t per square kilometre 0.3064 t per square kilometre 0.0591 t per square kilometre Italy
1980s 0.4057 t per square kilometre 0.312 t per square kilometre 0.0937 t per square kilometre Italy
1990s 0.4129 t per square kilometre 0.2319 t per square kilometre 0.1809 t per square kilometre Italy
2000s 0.3899 t per square kilometre 0.163 t per square kilometre 0.2269 t per square kilometre Italy
2010s 0.3008 t per square kilometre 0.2126 t per square kilometre 0.0882 t per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Italy or Poland?
Poland, at 0.2717 t per square kilometre against 0.2593 t per square kilometre in Italy as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Italy and Poland?
0.0124 t per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Poland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Italy and Poland rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Italy ranks 25th and Poland ranks 24th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Poland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/italy/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/italy/poland/">Italy vs Poland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.