Israel vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Israel
1.22 t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.6218 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
2nd
New Zealand rank
4th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Israel
  • New Zealand
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 1.22 t per square kilometre against 0.6218 t per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.5982 t per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 2.0 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Israel ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1281 t per square kilometre 0.2473 t per square kilometre 0.1193 t per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.1574 t per square kilometre 0.4016 t per square kilometre 0.2442 t per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.2193 t per square kilometre 0.4254 t per square kilometre 0.2062 t per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.3075 t per square kilometre 0.4803 t per square kilometre 0.1728 t per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.6777 t per square kilometre 0.5263 t per square kilometre 0.1515 t per square kilometre Israel
2010s 0.9441 t per square kilometre 0.5424 t per square kilometre 0.4017 t per square kilometre Israel
2020s 1.16 t per square kilometre 0.6153 t per square kilometre 0.5399 t per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Israel or New Zealand?
Israel, at 1.22 t per square kilometre against 0.6218 t per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Israel and New Zealand?
0.5982 t per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Israel ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/israel/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/israel/new-zealand/">Israel vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.