Ireland vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Ireland
1.38 t per square kilometre
in 2017
New Zealand
0.6218 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
1st
New Zealand rank
4th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Ireland
  • New Zealand
0.250.50.7511.21.5196119922023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 1.38 t per square kilometre against 0.6218 t per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.7582 t per square kilometre.

That makes Ireland's figure about 2.2 times New Zealand's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.

Ireland ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 4th of 167 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3619 t per square kilometre 0.2473 t per square kilometre 0.1146 t per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 0.6442 t per square kilometre 0.4016 t per square kilometre 0.2426 t per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 0.8199 t per square kilometre 0.4254 t per square kilometre 0.3944 t per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 1.2 t per square kilometre 0.4803 t per square kilometre 0.7211 t per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 1.24 t per square kilometre 0.5263 t per square kilometre 0.7118 t per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 1.25 t per square kilometre 0.5333 t per square kilometre 0.7147 t per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Ireland or New Zealand?
Ireland, at 1.38 t per square kilometre against 0.6218 t per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Ireland and New Zealand?
0.7582 t per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and New Zealand?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Ireland and New Zealand rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Ireland ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 4th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ireland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ireland/new-zealand/">Ireland vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.