Ireland vs Israel: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Ireland
1.38 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Israel
1.22 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
1st
Israel rank
2nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Ireland
  • Israel
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 1.38 t per square kilometre against 1.22 t per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.16 t per square kilometre.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.

Ireland ranks 1st and Israel ranks 2nd of 167 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3619 t per square kilometre 0.1281 t per square kilometre 0.2339 t per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 0.6442 t per square kilometre 0.1574 t per square kilometre 0.4868 t per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 0.8199 t per square kilometre 0.2193 t per square kilometre 0.6006 t per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 1.2 t per square kilometre 0.3075 t per square kilometre 0.8939 t per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 1.24 t per square kilometre 0.6777 t per square kilometre 0.5603 t per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 1.25 t per square kilometre 0.9331 t per square kilometre 0.3149 t per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Ireland or Israel?
Ireland, at 1.38 t per square kilometre against 1.22 t per square kilometre in Israel as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Ireland and Israel?
0.16 t per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Israel?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Ireland and Israel rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Ireland ranks 1st and Israel ranks 2nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Israel: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ireland/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ireland/israel/">Ireland vs Israel: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.