India vs Tunisia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

India
0.0449 t per square kilometre
in 1990
Tunisia
0.0443 t per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
100th
Tunisia rank
101st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • India
  • Tunisia
0.010.020.030.040.050.06196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 0.0449 t per square kilometre against 0.0443 t per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

India ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 101st of 167 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0234 t per square kilometre 0.0175 t per square kilometre 0.0059 t per square kilometre India
1970s 0.0302 t per square kilometre 0.029 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre India
1980s 0.0405 t per square kilometre 0.0339 t per square kilometre 0.0066 t per square kilometre India
1990s 0.0449 t per square kilometre 0.0325 t per square kilometre 0.0124 t per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, India or Tunisia?
India, at 0.0449 t per square kilometre against 0.0443 t per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 1990.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between India and Tunisia?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Tunisia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do India and Tunisia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
India ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 101st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Tunisia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/india/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/india/tunisia/">India vs Tunisia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.