Iceland vs Mali: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Iceland
0.0074 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
0.0083 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
147th
Mali rank
146th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Iceland
  • Mali
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0.0083 t per square kilometre against 0.0074 t per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0009 t per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.

Iceland ranks 147th and Mali ranks 146th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0037 t per square kilometre 0.0054 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Mali
1970s 0.0039 t per square kilometre 0.0056 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Mali
1980s 0.0041 t per square kilometre 0.0075 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre Mali
1990s 0.0051 t per square kilometre 0.0095 t per square kilometre 0.0044 t per square kilometre Mali
2000s 0.0055 t per square kilometre 0.0063 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Mali
2010s 0.0064 t per square kilometre 0.0059 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0074 t per square kilometre 0.0086 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Iceland or Mali?
Mali, at 0.0083 t per square kilometre against 0.0074 t per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Iceland and Mali?
0.0009 t per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mali?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mali rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Iceland ranks 147th and Mali ranks 146th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mali: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mali/">Iceland vs Mali: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.