Honduras vs Philippines: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Honduras
0.069 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
0.0676 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
76th
Philippines rank
78th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Honduras
  • Philippines
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 0.069 t per square kilometre against 0.0676 t per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 0.0014 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.

Honduras ranks 76th and Philippines ranks 78th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0224 t per square kilometre 0.0334 t per square kilometre 0.011 t per square kilometre Philippines
1970s 0.0441 t per square kilometre 0.05 t per square kilometre 0.0059 t per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 0.0458 t per square kilometre 0.0402 t per square kilometre 0.0057 t per square kilometre Honduras
1990s 0.0585 t per square kilometre 0.0649 t per square kilometre 0.0064 t per square kilometre Philippines
2000s 0.0653 t per square kilometre 0.1046 t per square kilometre 0.0394 t per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 0.0667 t per square kilometre 0.1035 t per square kilometre 0.0368 t per square kilometre Philippines
2020s 0.0687 t per square kilometre 0.0675 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Honduras or Philippines?
Honduras, at 0.069 t per square kilometre against 0.0676 t per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Honduras and Philippines?
0.0014 t per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Philippines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Philippines rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Honduras ranks 76th and Philippines ranks 78th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Philippines: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/honduras/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/honduras/philippines/">Honduras vs Philippines: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.