Haiti vs Rwanda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Haiti
0.3201 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.318 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Haiti rank
18th
Rwanda rank
19th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Haiti
  • Rwanda
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 0.3201 t per square kilometre against 0.318 t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0021 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.

Haiti ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1023 t per square kilometre 0.0442 t per square kilometre 0.0581 t per square kilometre Haiti
1970s 0.1349 t per square kilometre 0.0723 t per square kilometre 0.0626 t per square kilometre Haiti
1980s 0.1867 t per square kilometre 0.1084 t per square kilometre 0.0783 t per square kilometre Haiti
1990s 0.1772 t per square kilometre 0.1075 t per square kilometre 0.0697 t per square kilometre Haiti
2000s 0.2748 t per square kilometre 0.2099 t per square kilometre 0.0649 t per square kilometre Haiti
2010s 0.3018 t per square kilometre 0.2547 t per square kilometre 0.0471 t per square kilometre Haiti
2020s 0.318 t per square kilometre 0.3209 t per square kilometre 0.0029 t per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Haiti or Rwanda?
Haiti, at 0.3201 t per square kilometre against 0.318 t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Haiti and Rwanda?
0.0021 t per square kilometre, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Haiti and Rwanda rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Haiti ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Haiti vs Rwanda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/haiti/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/haiti/rwanda/">Haiti vs Rwanda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.