Guyana vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Guyana
0.002 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0015 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana rank
160th
Suriname rank
162nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Guyana
  • Suriname
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 0.002 t per square kilometre against 0.0015 t per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0005 t per square kilometre.

That makes Guyana's figure about 1.3 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 160th and Suriname ranks 162nd of 167 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0029 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre Guyana
1970s 0.0029 t per square kilometre 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 0.0016 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Guyana
1990s 0.0024 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Guyana
2000s 0.0016 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Guyana
2010s 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Guyana or Suriname?
Guyana, at 0.002 t per square kilometre against 0.0015 t per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Guyana and Suriname?
0.0005 t per square kilometre, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Guyana ranks 160th and Suriname ranks 162nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/guyana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/guyana/suriname/">Guyana vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.