Georgia vs Malawi: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Georgia
0.0856 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.0881 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
66th
Malawi rank
64th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Georgia
  • Malawi
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0881 t per square kilometre against 0.0856 t per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 0.0025 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 66th and Malawi ranks 64th of 167 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1747 t per square kilometre 0.0204 t per square kilometre 0.1544 t per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.1531 t per square kilometre 0.0298 t per square kilometre 0.1233 t per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0827 t per square kilometre 0.0529 t per square kilometre 0.0299 t per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.0821 t per square kilometre 0.0799 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Georgia or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.0881 t per square kilometre against 0.0856 t per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Georgia and Malawi?
0.0025 t per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malawi?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Malawi rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Georgia ranks 66th and Malawi ranks 64th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Malawi: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/georgia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/georgia/malawi/">Georgia vs Malawi: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.