French Polynesia vs Iceland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
French Polynesia
0.0068 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0074 t per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
150th
Iceland rank
147th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- French Polynesia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0074 t per square kilometre against 0.0068 t per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 150th and Iceland ranks 147th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 6 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0104 t per square kilometre | 0.0037 t per square kilometre | 0.0067 t per square kilometre | French Polynesia |
| 1970s | 0.0091 t per square kilometre | 0.0039 t per square kilometre | 0.0052 t per square kilometre | French Polynesia |
| 1980s | 0.0088 t per square kilometre | 0.0041 t per square kilometre | 0.0047 t per square kilometre | French Polynesia |
| 1990s | 0.0058 t per square kilometre | 0.0051 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | French Polynesia |
| 2000s | 0.0059 t per square kilometre | 0.0055 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 0.006 t per square kilometre | 0.0064 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.0076 t per square kilometre | 0.0074 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, French Polynesia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 0.0074 t per square kilometre against 0.0068 t per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between French Polynesia and Iceland?
- 0.0006 t per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Iceland rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- French Polynesia ranks 150th and Iceland ranks 147th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.