France vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

France
0.3579 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Malta
0.3491 t per square kilometre
in 2017
France rank
12th
Malta rank
14th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • France
  • Malta
0.40.60.81196119892017

How they compare

France currently reports 0.3579 t per square kilometre against 0.3491 t per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.0088 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

France ranks 12th and Malta ranks 14th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3719 t per square kilometre 0.8017 t per square kilometre 0.4298 t per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.4137 t per square kilometre 0.6436 t per square kilometre 0.2299 t per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.4618 t per square kilometre 0.5357 t per square kilometre 0.0739 t per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.4378 t per square kilometre 0.5194 t per square kilometre 0.0816 t per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.3871 t per square kilometre 0.4586 t per square kilometre 0.0714 t per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.3668 t per square kilometre 0.3603 t per square kilometre 0.0065 t per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, France or Malta?
France, at 0.3579 t per square kilometre against 0.3491 t per square kilometre in Malta as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between France and Malta?
0.0088 t per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do France and Malta rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
France ranks 12th and Malta ranks 14th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/france/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/france/malta/">France vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.