Finland vs Vanuatu: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Finland
0.0223 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Vanuatu
0.0226 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
125th
Vanuatu rank
124th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Finland
  • Vanuatu
0.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Vanuatu currently reports 0.0226 t per square kilometre against 0.0223 t per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0003 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 125th and Vanuatu ranks 124th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Vanuatu in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0391 t per square kilometre 0.0161 t per square kilometre 0.023 t per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0478 t per square kilometre 0.0265 t per square kilometre 0.0213 t per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.0459 t per square kilometre 0.0257 t per square kilometre 0.0202 t per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.0271 t per square kilometre 0.041 t per square kilometre 0.0139 t per square kilometre Vanuatu
2000s 0.023 t per square kilometre 0.0346 t per square kilometre 0.0116 t per square kilometre Vanuatu
2010s 0.0218 t per square kilometre 0.0336 t per square kilometre 0.0118 t per square kilometre Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Finland or Vanuatu?
Vanuatu, at 0.0226 t per square kilometre against 0.0223 t per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Finland and Vanuatu?
0.0003 t per square kilometre, with Vanuatu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Vanuatu?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Finland and Vanuatu rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Finland ranks 125th and Vanuatu ranks 124th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Vanuatu: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/finland/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/finland/vanuatu/">Finland vs Vanuatu: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.