Finland vs Mongolia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Finland
0.0223 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Mongolia
0.0208 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
125th
Mongolia rank
126th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Finland
  • Mongolia
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.0223 t per square kilometre against 0.0208 t per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0015 t per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 126th of 167 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0391 t per square kilometre 0.0067 t per square kilometre 0.0324 t per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0478 t per square kilometre 0.0086 t per square kilometre 0.0392 t per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.0459 t per square kilometre 0.0101 t per square kilometre 0.0357 t per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.0271 t per square kilometre 0.0115 t per square kilometre 0.0157 t per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.023 t per square kilometre 0.0083 t per square kilometre 0.0147 t per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0218 t per square kilometre 0.0098 t per square kilometre 0.012 t per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Finland or Mongolia?
Finland, at 0.0223 t per square kilometre against 0.0208 t per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Finland and Mongolia?
0.0015 t per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mongolia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Finland and Mongolia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Finland ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 126th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Mongolia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/finland/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/finland/mongolia/">Finland vs Mongolia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.