Finland vs Kazakhstan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Finland
0.0223 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Kazakhstan
0.0229 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
125th
Kazakhstan rank
123rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Finland
  • Kazakhstan
0.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0229 t per square kilometre against 0.0223 t per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Finland ranks 125th and Kazakhstan ranks 123rd of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0261 t per square kilometre 0.0286 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.023 t per square kilometre 0.0196 t per square kilometre 0.0033 t per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0218 t per square kilometre 0.0163 t per square kilometre 0.0055 t per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Finland or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 0.0229 t per square kilometre against 0.0223 t per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Finland and Kazakhstan?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kazakhstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Finland and Kazakhstan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Finland ranks 125th and Kazakhstan ranks 123rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Kazakhstan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/finland/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/finland/kazakhstan/">Finland vs Kazakhstan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.