Fiji vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Fiji
0.0356 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0324 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji rank
107th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
110th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Fiji
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 0.0356 t per square kilometre against 0.0324 t per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0032 t per square kilometre.

That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Fiji ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 110th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0264 t per square kilometre 0.0455 t per square kilometre 0.0191 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0412 t per square kilometre 0.0475 t per square kilometre 0.0063 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0703 t per square kilometre 0.0488 t per square kilometre 0.0215 t per square kilometre Fiji
1990s 0.0271 t per square kilometre 0.0349 t per square kilometre 0.0077 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0177 t per square kilometre 0.025 t per square kilometre 0.0074 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0211 t per square kilometre 0.0324 t per square kilometre 0.0113 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0287 t per square kilometre 0.0321 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Fiji or Trinidad and Tobago?
Fiji, at 0.0356 t per square kilometre against 0.0324 t per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Fiji and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0032 t per square kilometre, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Fiji ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 110th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/fiji/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/fiji/trinidad-and-tobago/">Fiji vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.