Fiji vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Fiji
0.0356 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0347 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji rank
107th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
108th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Fiji
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 0.0356 t per square kilometre against 0.0347 t per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0009 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Fiji ranks 107th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 108th of 167 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0264 t per square kilometre 0.0719 t per square kilometre 0.0455 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0412 t per square kilometre 0.0658 t per square kilometre 0.0246 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0703 t per square kilometre 0.0823 t per square kilometre 0.012 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0271 t per square kilometre 0.077 t per square kilometre 0.0498 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0177 t per square kilometre 0.0791 t per square kilometre 0.0614 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0211 t per square kilometre 0.0426 t per square kilometre 0.0215 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0287 t per square kilometre 0.0324 t per square kilometre 0.0037 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Fiji or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Fiji, at 0.0356 t per square kilometre against 0.0347 t per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Fiji and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0009 t per square kilometre, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Fiji ranks 107th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 108th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/fiji/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/fiji/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Fiji vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.