Eswatini vs Lithuania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Eswatini
0.1154 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania
0.1174 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Eswatini rank
54th
Lithuania rank
53rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Lithuania
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.1174 t per square kilometre against 0.1154 t per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.002 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Eswatini ranks 54th and Lithuania ranks 53rd of 167 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.096 t per square kilometre 0.3227 t per square kilometre 0.2266 t per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 0.097 t per square kilometre 0.142 t per square kilometre 0.045 t per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 0.1073 t per square kilometre 0.1172 t per square kilometre 0.0099 t per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Eswatini or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 0.1174 t per square kilometre against 0.1154 t per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Eswatini and Lithuania?
0.002 t per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lithuania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Eswatini and Lithuania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Eswatini ranks 54th and Lithuania ranks 53rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Lithuania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/lithuania/">Eswatini vs Lithuania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.