Eritrea vs Tunisia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Eritrea
0.0425 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0443 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea rank
103rd
Tunisia rank
101st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Eritrea
  • Tunisia
0.010.020.030.040.050.06196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0443 t per square kilometre against 0.0425 t per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0018 t per square kilometre.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 103rd and Tunisia ranks 101st of 167 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0252 t per square kilometre 0.0433 t per square kilometre 0.0181 t per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.032 t per square kilometre 0.0492 t per square kilometre 0.0172 t per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.0386 t per square kilometre 0.0527 t per square kilometre 0.0141 t per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.0414 t per square kilometre 0.0472 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Eritrea or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.0443 t per square kilometre against 0.0425 t per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Eritrea and Tunisia?
0.0018 t per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tunisia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Tunisia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Eritrea ranks 103rd and Tunisia ranks 101st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Tunisia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/tunisia/">Eritrea vs Tunisia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.