Ecuador vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Ecuador
0.2032 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.1894 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
31st
Uganda rank
34th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Uganda
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.2032 t per square kilometre against 0.1894 t per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0138 t per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Ecuador ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 34th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0321 t per square kilometre 0.0518 t per square kilometre 0.0196 t per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 0.0487 t per square kilometre 0.0687 t per square kilometre 0.02 t per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 0.0623 t per square kilometre 0.0657 t per square kilometre 0.0033 t per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 0.1009 t per square kilometre 0.0742 t per square kilometre 0.0267 t per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.1463 t per square kilometre 0.1182 t per square kilometre 0.0281 t per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.1793 t per square kilometre 0.1688 t per square kilometre 0.0105 t per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.1858 t per square kilometre 0.1894 t per square kilometre 0.0036 t per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Ecuador or Uganda?
Ecuador, at 0.2032 t per square kilometre against 0.1894 t per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Ecuador and Uganda?
0.0138 t per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Uganda rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Ecuador ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/uganda/">Ecuador vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.