Dominican Republic vs Guatemala: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Dominican Republic
0.1884 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.1913 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
35th
Guatemala rank
32nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Guatemala
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.1913 t per square kilometre against 0.1884 t per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.0029 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 35th and Guatemala ranks 32nd of 167 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0784 t per square kilometre 0.0422 t per square kilometre 0.0362 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1970s 0.1153 t per square kilometre 0.0577 t per square kilometre 0.0576 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1980s 0.1843 t per square kilometre 0.0477 t per square kilometre 0.1366 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1990s 0.1936 t per square kilometre 0.0502 t per square kilometre 0.1435 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 0.2425 t per square kilometre 0.0632 t per square kilometre 0.1792 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 0.2571 t per square kilometre 0.1596 t per square kilometre 0.0975 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 0.1888 t per square kilometre 0.1885 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Dominican Republic or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.1913 t per square kilometre against 0.1884 t per square kilometre in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Dominican Republic and Guatemala?
0.0029 t per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Guatemala rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Dominican Republic ranks 35th and Guatemala ranks 32nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Guatemala: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/guatemala/">Dominican Republic vs Guatemala: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.