Denmark vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Denmark
0.2787 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Zimbabwe
0.2748 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
22nd
Zimbabwe rank
23rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Denmark
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0.2787 t per square kilometre against 0.2748 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0039 t per square kilometre.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 167 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3389 t per square kilometre 0.0209 t per square kilometre 0.318 t per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 0.3745 t per square kilometre 0.0361 t per square kilometre 0.3384 t per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 0.4268 t per square kilometre 0.0288 t per square kilometre 0.398 t per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 0.419 t per square kilometre 0.1791 t per square kilometre 0.2399 t per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 0.3162 t per square kilometre 0.2083 t per square kilometre 0.1079 t per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 0.2865 t per square kilometre 0.2374 t per square kilometre 0.0491 t per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Denmark or Zimbabwe?
Denmark, at 0.2787 t per square kilometre against 0.2748 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Denmark and Zimbabwe?
0.0039 t per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Zimbabwe?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Denmark and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Denmark ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/denmark/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/denmark/zimbabwe/">Denmark vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.