Cuba vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Cuba
0.1349 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.128 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Cuba rank
47th
Romania rank
49th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Cuba
- Romania
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.1349 t per square kilometre against 0.128 t per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0069 t per square kilometre.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 47th and Romania ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3243 t per square kilometre | 0.2122 t per square kilometre | 0.1121 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.2985 t per square kilometre | 0.2931 t per square kilometre | 0.0055 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.2652 t per square kilometre | 0.2641 t per square kilometre | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.1476 t per square kilometre | 0.2613 t per square kilometre | 0.1137 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.1171 t per square kilometre | 0.1879 t per square kilometre | 0.0708 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.1378 t per square kilometre | 0.1385 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Cuba or Romania?
- Cuba, at 0.1349 t per square kilometre against 0.128 t per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Cuba and Romania?
- 0.0069 t per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Romania?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
- How do Cuba and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Cuba ranks 47th and Romania ranks 49th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.