Cuba vs Panama: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Cuba
0.1349 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.1378 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
47th
Panama rank
46th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Cuba
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.1378 t per square kilometre against 0.1349 t per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0029 t per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 47th and Panama ranks 46th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3243 t per square kilometre | 0.0465 t per square kilometre | 0.2778 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.2985 t per square kilometre | 0.07 t per square kilometre | 0.2286 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.2652 t per square kilometre | 0.0917 t per square kilometre | 0.1735 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.1476 t per square kilometre | 0.1202 t per square kilometre | 0.0274 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.1171 t per square kilometre | 0.1242 t per square kilometre | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.1409 t per square kilometre | 0.1477 t per square kilometre | 0.0068 t per square kilometre | Panama |
| 2020s | 0.1445 t per square kilometre | 0.1393 t per square kilometre | 0.0051 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Cuba or Panama?
- Panama, at 0.1378 t per square kilometre against 0.1349 t per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Cuba and Panama?
- 0.0029 t per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Panama rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Cuba ranks 47th and Panama ranks 46th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.