Cuba vs Japan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Cuba
0.1349 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
0.1401 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
47th
Japan rank
44th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Cuba
  • Japan
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.1401 t per square kilometre against 0.1349 t per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0052 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 47th and Japan ranks 44th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Japan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3243 t per square kilometre 0.051 t per square kilometre 0.2733 t per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.2985 t per square kilometre 0.093 t per square kilometre 0.2056 t per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.2652 t per square kilometre 0.1489 t per square kilometre 0.1163 t per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.1476 t per square kilometre 0.1583 t per square kilometre 0.0107 t per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.1171 t per square kilometre 0.1417 t per square kilometre 0.0246 t per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0.1409 t per square kilometre 0.137 t per square kilometre 0.0039 t per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.1445 t per square kilometre 0.136 t per square kilometre 0.0085 t per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Cuba or Japan?
Japan, at 0.1401 t per square kilometre against 0.1349 t per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Cuba and Japan?
0.0052 t per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Japan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Cuba ranks 47th and Japan ranks 44th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Japan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/cuba/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/cuba/japan/">Cuba vs Japan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.