Congo vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Congo
0.002 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0015 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
159th
Suriname rank
162nd
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.002 t per square kilometre against 0.0015 t per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0005 t per square kilometre.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.4 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.
Congo ranks 159th and Suriname ranks 162nd of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.001 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.002 t per square kilometre | 0.0015 t per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | 0.0015 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.0022 t per square kilometre | 0.0016 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | 0.0016 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Congo or Suriname?
- Congo, at 0.002 t per square kilometre against 0.0015 t per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Congo and Suriname?
- 0.0005 t per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Congo ranks 159th and Suriname ranks 162nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.