Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Congo
0.002 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.0039 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
159th
Saudi Arabia rank
156th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Congo
  • Saudi Arabia
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0039 t per square kilometre against 0.002 t per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0019 t per square kilometre.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.9 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 159th and Saudi Arabia ranks 156th of 167 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1970s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0019 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0023 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0024 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0.0037 t per square kilometre 0.0014 t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0038 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Congo or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.0039 t per square kilometre against 0.002 t per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Congo and Saudi Arabia?
0.0019 t per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Saudi Arabia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Congo ranks 159th and Saudi Arabia ranks 156th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/saudi-arabia/">Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.