Comoros vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Comoros
0.1198 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.128 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Comoros rank
52nd
Romania rank
49th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Comoros
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.128 t per square kilometre against 0.1198 t per square kilometre in Comoros, a difference of 0.0082 t per square kilometre.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Comoros ranks 52nd and Romania ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0956 t per square kilometre | 0.2122 t per square kilometre | 0.1166 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 1970s | 0.1474 t per square kilometre | 0.2931 t per square kilometre | 0.1457 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 1980s | 0.1116 t per square kilometre | 0.2641 t per square kilometre | 0.1525 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 1990s | 0.0956 t per square kilometre | 0.2613 t per square kilometre | 0.1657 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.1153 t per square kilometre | 0.1879 t per square kilometre | 0.0726 t per square kilometre | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.1212 t per square kilometre | 0.1385 t per square kilometre | 0.0174 t per square kilometre | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Comoros or Romania?
- Romania, at 0.128 t per square kilometre against 0.1198 t per square kilometre in Comoros as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Comoros and Romania?
- 0.0082 t per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Romania?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
- How do Comoros and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Comoros ranks 52nd and Romania ranks 49th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.