Comoros vs Lithuania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Comoros
0.1198 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania
0.1174 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Comoros rank
52nd
Lithuania rank
53rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Comoros
  • Lithuania
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0.1198 t per square kilometre against 0.1174 t per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0024 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Comoros ranks 52nd and Lithuania ranks 53rd of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0961 t per square kilometre 0.3227 t per square kilometre 0.2266 t per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 0.1153 t per square kilometre 0.142 t per square kilometre 0.0266 t per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 0.1212 t per square kilometre 0.1172 t per square kilometre 0.0039 t per square kilometre Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Comoros or Lithuania?
Comoros, at 0.1198 t per square kilometre against 0.1174 t per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Comoros and Lithuania?
0.0024 t per square kilometre, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Lithuania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Comoros and Lithuania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Comoros ranks 52nd and Lithuania ranks 53rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Lithuania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/comoros/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/comoros/lithuania/">Comoros vs Lithuania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.