China vs El Salvador: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

China
0.1574 t per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.1539 t per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
39th
El Salvador rank
41st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • China
  • El Salvador
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.1574 t per square kilometre against 0.1539 t per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0035 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

China ranks 39th and El Salvador ranks 41st of 167 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0027 t per square kilometre 0.1675 t per square kilometre 0.1648 t per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.0046 t per square kilometre 0.2343 t per square kilometre 0.2297 t per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.011 t per square kilometre 0.1988 t per square kilometre 0.1878 t per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.0604 t per square kilometre 0.2484 t per square kilometre 0.188 t per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.1189 t per square kilometre 0.2767 t per square kilometre 0.1578 t per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.131 t per square kilometre 0.1848 t per square kilometre 0.0538 t per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.1485 t per square kilometre 0.1631 t per square kilometre 0.0146 t per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, China or El Salvador?
China, at 0.1574 t per square kilometre against 0.1539 t per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between China and El Salvador?
0.0035 t per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and El Salvador rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
China ranks 39th and El Salvador ranks 41st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs El Salvador: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/">China vs El Salvador: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.