Chile vs Yemen: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Chile
0.0314 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Yemen
0.0312 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
113th
Yemen rank
114th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Chile
  • Yemen
0.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0314 t per square kilometre against 0.0312 t per square kilometre in Yemen, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 114th of 167 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Yemen Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0257 t per square kilometre 0.0066 t per square kilometre 0.0192 t per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0273 t per square kilometre 0.0071 t per square kilometre 0.0201 t per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0317 t per square kilometre 0.0125 t per square kilometre 0.0191 t per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0402 t per square kilometre 0.0146 t per square kilometre 0.0255 t per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0366 t per square kilometre 0.0258 t per square kilometre 0.0108 t per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0349 t per square kilometre 0.0306 t per square kilometre 0.0042 t per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.034 t per square kilometre 0.0297 t per square kilometre 0.0043 t per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Chile or Yemen?
Chile, at 0.0314 t per square kilometre against 0.0312 t per square kilometre in Yemen as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Chile and Yemen?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Yemen?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Yemen rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Chile ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 114th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Yemen: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chile/yemen-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chile/yemen-rep/">Chile vs Yemen: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.