Chile vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Chile
0.0314 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0324 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
113th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
110th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Chile
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.010.020.030.040.050.06196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0324 t per square kilometre against 0.0314 t per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.001 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Chile ranks 113th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 110th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0257 t per square kilometre 0.0455 t per square kilometre 0.0198 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0273 t per square kilometre 0.0475 t per square kilometre 0.0202 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0317 t per square kilometre 0.0488 t per square kilometre 0.0171 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0402 t per square kilometre 0.0349 t per square kilometre 0.0053 t per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0366 t per square kilometre 0.025 t per square kilometre 0.0116 t per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0349 t per square kilometre 0.0324 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.034 t per square kilometre 0.0321 t per square kilometre 0.0019 t per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Chile or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0324 t per square kilometre against 0.0314 t per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Chile and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.001 t per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Chile ranks 113th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 110th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chile/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chile/trinidad-and-tobago/">Chile vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.