Chile vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Chile
0.0314 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan
0.032 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
113th
Sudan rank
111th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Chile
  • Sudan
0.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.032 t per square kilometre against 0.0314 t per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 113th and Sudan ranks 111th of 167 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0352 t per square kilometre 0.033 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.034 t per square kilometre 0.0329 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Chile or Sudan?
Sudan, at 0.032 t per square kilometre against 0.0314 t per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Chile and Sudan?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sudan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Chile ranks 113th and Sudan ranks 111th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chile/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chile/sudan/">Chile vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.