Chad vs Ethiopia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Chad
0.0743 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ethiopia
0.0743 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
74th
Ethiopia rank
75th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Chad
  • Ethiopia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0743 t per square kilometre against 0.0743 t per square kilometre in Ethiopia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Chad ranks 74th and Ethiopia ranks 75th of 167 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0195 t per square kilometre 0.0518 t per square kilometre 0.0323 t per square kilometre Ethiopia
2000s 0.0305 t per square kilometre 0.064 t per square kilometre 0.0336 t per square kilometre Ethiopia
2010s 0.0506 t per square kilometre 0.0687 t per square kilometre 0.0182 t per square kilometre Ethiopia
2020s 0.0688 t per square kilometre 0.0749 t per square kilometre 0.0061 t per square kilometre Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Chad or Ethiopia?
Chad, at 0.0743 t per square kilometre against 0.0743 t per square kilometre in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Chad and Ethiopia?
0 t per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Ethiopia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Chad and Ethiopia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Chad ranks 74th and Ethiopia ranks 75th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Ethiopia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chad/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chad/ethiopia/">Chad vs Ethiopia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.